VIACOM GUILTY ?

!±8± VIACOM GUILTY ?

KEEP A GOOD EYE ON THE HONORS FOR THIS VIDEO! THE LAST FEW HAVE BEEN VERY SLOW TO UPDATE! IN CASE ANYTHING HAPPENS TO MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL, ADD ME AS A FRIEND ON MYSPACE: profile.myspace.com Here are my other videos on Viacom: www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com Viacom appears to have abused their ability to remove videos and entire channels through copyright claims. While I have always agreed that their property should be protected and should be removed if they needed it to be. This time they crossed the line. Actually they have done this many times before. Here is a link to one of their most abusive copyright issues in the past: theknightshift.blogspot.com This is not the only time Viacom has acted very aggressively with people on the internet. They do this because they are a large corporation and think they can get away with it. For the most part they have. Recently some trigger happy person at Viacom took down the video Viacom vs you from youtube. It was obvious to everyone that there was absolutely no copyright issue with that video whatsoever. Yet it was still removed. Most videos that are taken down unjustly never see the light of day again. I am only back up now because of all the support from my viewers. This is not just a Viacom problem, it is also a youtube problem. Anyone can accuse any channel anytime for copyright infringement. It is up to the accused to prove their innocence rather then the accusor. From what I have seen there are ...

VIACOM GUILTY ?

Cheep Defibrillator Heartstart Good Bargain Cableone Boise Top 10 Vtech Additional Handset

Trademark Infringement

!±8± Trademark Infringement

We have and continue to handle many trademark infringement cases. To determine if it is a trademark infringement, the courts look at the following factors: 1. the strength of the mark; 2. the degree of similarity between the two marks; 3. the proximity of the products; 4. the likelihood that the prior owner will bridge the gap; 5. actual confusion; 6. defendant's good faith in adopting its own mark; 7. the quality of defendant's product; and, 8. the sophistication of the buyers. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list, but is merely a starting point. Furthermore, when evaluating the similarity of the marks, the sound, meaning and commercial impression of the marks are evaluated (see factor #2). The ultimate test is whether or not consumers are going to be confused. There are also additional provisions in the law to remedy § 43(a) Unfair Competition (15 USC § 1125(a)) - Under the Lanham act, unregistered marks are protected as well. And trade dress, etc. This provision has far reaching implications and has provided protection for restaurant formats, colors of products, sounds and smells. The key difference in proving an infringement of a registered trademark and an unregistered mark is that in the case of an unregistered mark it is necessary to demonstrate that the mark functions as a mark, namely that it has acquired secondary meaning and it indicates source There is also protection for famous marks and to prevent dilution of those marks. Under the trademark statute ...

Trademark Infringement

Discounted 110v To 12v Power Converter Lowest Price Bathroom Fan Heater Butterfinger Nestle Fast

!±8± Federal Unfair Competition: Lanham Act, Section 43a

Brand : | Rate : | Price :
Post Date : Jan 04, 2012 05:19:32 | N/A

Federal Unfair Competition: Lanham Act, Section 43a

More Specification..!!

Federal Unfair Competition: Lanham Act, Section 43a

Saving Breadman Bread Machine Recipe Bargain Sale Turntable Cd